mouse anti cecr2 Search Results


92
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti cecr2
Mouse Anti Cecr2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/CECR2+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2020__09__10__291799-220-21-34
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti cecr2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti csf1
Mouse Anti Csf1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/M-CSF+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2020__09__10__291799-220-25-34
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti csf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti c rel
Rabbit Anti C Rel, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/c-Rel+Rabbit+mAb/bio_rxiv__2020__09__10__291799-220-51-59
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti c rel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse anti gapdh
Mouse Anti Gapdh, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/GAPDH+Mouse+mAb/bio_rxiv__2020__09__10__291799-220-55-59
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti gapdh - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti nf κb p50
Mouse Anti Nf κb P50, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/NF%CE%BAB+p50+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2020__09__10__291799-220-29-34
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti nf κb p50 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti relb
Rabbit Anti Relb, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/RelB+Antibody/bio_rxiv__2020__09__10__291799-220-47-59
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti relb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti perk
Mouse Anti Perk, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/p-ERK+Antibody/pmc08290069-84-68-71
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti perk - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology hpse mouse mab
<t>HPSE</t> expression is regulated through BPTF’s recognition of H3K4me3 (A) Comparisons of the protein abundance <t>of</t> <t>BPTF</t> between adjacent normal tissue (N) samples and tumor (T) (paired t test) in the HCC patients’ cohort ( n = 159). The line represents mean with SEM and upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The p value is depicted in the figure. (B) Volcano plot illustrating differentially expressed gene sets that are significantly down-regulated or up-regulated in Huh7 cells in response to BPTF silencing according to RNA-seq data; comparison between two biological replicates ( n = 2). (C) RT-qPCR analysis showing changes in HPSE mRNA levels in Huh7 cells with or without KD of BPTF. The RT-qPCR signal was normalized by GAPDH ( n = 3). (D) Genome browser view of CUT&Tag sequencing signal on the chromosome 4 segment, showing the localization of BPTF (depicted in red) and H3K4me3 (shown in blue) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells; and H3K4me3 (shown in pink) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in BPTF KD Huh7 cells. (E) IP assay using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to confirm the endogenous association between BPTF with H3K4me3 in Huh7 cells. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (F) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of BPTF at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). (G) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-H3K4me3 antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of H3K4me3 at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). The data in (C), (F), and (G) were presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; unpaired t test.
Hpse Mouse Mab, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/HPA1+Antibody/pmc11997503-307-22-25
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hpse mouse mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti cleaved caspase 3 asp175
<t>HPSE</t> expression is regulated through BPTF’s recognition of H3K4me3 (A) Comparisons of the protein abundance <t>of</t> <t>BPTF</t> between adjacent normal tissue (N) samples and tumor (T) (paired t test) in the HCC patients’ cohort ( n = 159). The line represents mean with SEM and upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The p value is depicted in the figure. (B) Volcano plot illustrating differentially expressed gene sets that are significantly down-regulated or up-regulated in Huh7 cells in response to BPTF silencing according to RNA-seq data; comparison between two biological replicates ( n = 2). (C) RT-qPCR analysis showing changes in HPSE mRNA levels in Huh7 cells with or without KD of BPTF. The RT-qPCR signal was normalized by GAPDH ( n = 3). (D) Genome browser view of CUT&Tag sequencing signal on the chromosome 4 segment, showing the localization of BPTF (depicted in red) and H3K4me3 (shown in blue) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells; and H3K4me3 (shown in pink) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in BPTF KD Huh7 cells. (E) IP assay using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to confirm the endogenous association between BPTF with H3K4me3 in Huh7 cells. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (F) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of BPTF at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). (G) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-H3K4me3 antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of H3K4me3 at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). The data in (C), (F), and (G) were presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; unpaired t test.
Anti Cleaved Caspase 3 Asp175, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/Cleaved+Caspase-3+(Asp175)+Antibody/pmc10324518-90-22-26
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cleaved caspase 3 asp175 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech crbn polyclonal antibody
Design and synthesis of BPTF-targeting PROTACs (A) The chemical structure of BPTF PROTACs. The BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) are designed with a structure that involves the conjugation of a BPTF inhibitor (TP238) to an E3 ligase binder (Poma) via linkers of varying PEG lengths. The TP238, E3 ligase binder, and linkers are highlighted in blue, red, and black respectively. (B) Binding energy of four different linker systems. T, E, and P symbolize the target protein, E3 ligase, and PROTAC molecule, respectively. The error bar was calculated as the standard deviation between different frames in a single molecular dynamics simulation system. (C) <t>CRBN-PROTAC-BPTF</t> ternary structure of the best-ranked 8d , in which the chemical structure of PROTAC was highlighted. CRBN was shown cyan and BPTF was shown green. The highlighted PROTAC molecule was represented using multiple colors, with TP238 in yellow, Poma in blue, and linker in orange. (D) Scheme of the action model for the designed BPTF PROTAC degrader. The PROTAC degrader recruits E3 ligase to induce ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of BPTF.
Crbn Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/CRBN+Polyclonal+antibody/pmc11997503-307-34-37
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
crbn polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech rabbit polyclonal anti luzp1
Design and synthesis of BPTF-targeting PROTACs (A) The chemical structure of BPTF PROTACs. The BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) are designed with a structure that involves the conjugation of a BPTF inhibitor (TP238) to an E3 ligase binder (Poma) via linkers of varying PEG lengths. The TP238, E3 ligase binder, and linkers are highlighted in blue, red, and black respectively. (B) Binding energy of four different linker systems. T, E, and P symbolize the target protein, E3 ligase, and PROTAC molecule, respectively. The error bar was calculated as the standard deviation between different frames in a single molecular dynamics simulation system. (C) <t>CRBN-PROTAC-BPTF</t> ternary structure of the best-ranked 8d , in which the chemical structure of PROTAC was highlighted. CRBN was shown cyan and BPTF was shown green. The highlighted PROTAC molecule was represented using multiple colors, with TP238 in yellow, Poma in blue, and linker in orange. (D) Scheme of the action model for the designed BPTF PROTAC degrader. The PROTAC degrader recruits E3 ligase to induce ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of BPTF.
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Luzp1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/LUZP1+Polyclonal+antibody/pm34197713-58-19-23
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti luzp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti lamin a c
Design and synthesis of BPTF-targeting PROTACs (A) The chemical structure of BPTF PROTACs. The BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) are designed with a structure that involves the conjugation of a BPTF inhibitor (TP238) to an E3 ligase binder (Poma) via linkers of varying PEG lengths. The TP238, E3 ligase binder, and linkers are highlighted in blue, red, and black respectively. (B) Binding energy of four different linker systems. T, E, and P symbolize the target protein, E3 ligase, and PROTAC molecule, respectively. The error bar was calculated as the standard deviation between different frames in a single molecular dynamics simulation system. (C) <t>CRBN-PROTAC-BPTF</t> ternary structure of the best-ranked 8d , in which the chemical structure of PROTAC was highlighted. CRBN was shown cyan and BPTF was shown green. The highlighted PROTAC molecule was represented using multiple colors, with TP238 in yellow, Poma in blue, and linker in orange. (D) Scheme of the action model for the designed BPTF PROTAC degrader. The PROTAC degrader recruits E3 ligase to induce ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of BPTF.
Anti Lamin A C, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti+cecr2/Lamin+A%2FC+Antibody/pmc07529788-188-29-31
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti lamin a c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


HPSE expression is regulated through BPTF’s recognition of H3K4me3 (A) Comparisons of the protein abundance of BPTF between adjacent normal tissue (N) samples and tumor (T) (paired t test) in the HCC patients’ cohort ( n = 159). The line represents mean with SEM and upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The p value is depicted in the figure. (B) Volcano plot illustrating differentially expressed gene sets that are significantly down-regulated or up-regulated in Huh7 cells in response to BPTF silencing according to RNA-seq data; comparison between two biological replicates ( n = 2). (C) RT-qPCR analysis showing changes in HPSE mRNA levels in Huh7 cells with or without KD of BPTF. The RT-qPCR signal was normalized by GAPDH ( n = 3). (D) Genome browser view of CUT&Tag sequencing signal on the chromosome 4 segment, showing the localization of BPTF (depicted in red) and H3K4me3 (shown in blue) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells; and H3K4me3 (shown in pink) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in BPTF KD Huh7 cells. (E) IP assay using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to confirm the endogenous association between BPTF with H3K4me3 in Huh7 cells. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (F) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of BPTF at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). (G) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-H3K4me3 antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of H3K4me3 at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). The data in (C), (F), and (G) were presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; unpaired t test.

Journal: Molecular Therapy

Article Title: A BPTF-specific PROTAC degrader enhances NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.02.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: HPSE expression is regulated through BPTF’s recognition of H3K4me3 (A) Comparisons of the protein abundance of BPTF between adjacent normal tissue (N) samples and tumor (T) (paired t test) in the HCC patients’ cohort ( n = 159). The line represents mean with SEM and upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The p value is depicted in the figure. (B) Volcano plot illustrating differentially expressed gene sets that are significantly down-regulated or up-regulated in Huh7 cells in response to BPTF silencing according to RNA-seq data; comparison between two biological replicates ( n = 2). (C) RT-qPCR analysis showing changes in HPSE mRNA levels in Huh7 cells with or without KD of BPTF. The RT-qPCR signal was normalized by GAPDH ( n = 3). (D) Genome browser view of CUT&Tag sequencing signal on the chromosome 4 segment, showing the localization of BPTF (depicted in red) and H3K4me3 (shown in blue) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells; and H3K4me3 (shown in pink) binding peaks at the promoter region of HPSE in BPTF KD Huh7 cells. (E) IP assay using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to confirm the endogenous association between BPTF with H3K4me3 in Huh7 cells. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (F) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-BPTF antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of BPTF at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). (G) CUT&Tag qPCR analysis using anti-H3K4me3 antibody and IgG control to detect the enrichment of H3K4me3 at the promoter region of HPSE in Huh7 cells ( n = 3). The data in (C), (F), and (G) were presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; unpaired t test.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were BRD9 Rabbit mAb (CST, #58906), CECR2 Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514878), BPTF Rabbit mAb (Abcam, ab72036), HPSE Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-515935), HS Mouse mAb (Millipore, #MAB2040), CRBN Polyclonal antibody (Proteintech, 28494-1-AP), anti-ubiquitin mouse mAb (NT) (PTM BIO, #PTM-5798), β-actin (8H10D10) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700).

Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative Proteomics, RNA Sequencing, Comparison, Quantitative RT-PCR, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Control

8d selectively degrades BPTF in a proteasome-dependent manner (A) Immunoblotting of BPTF, HPSE, CECR2 and BRD9 in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) at 10 μM for 24 h, respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (B) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at the indicated doses (0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 25 μM) for 24 h β-actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (C) Degradation curves of BPTF in 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The expression level of BPTF was normalized to the level of β-actin. n = 3. (D) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at 10 μM for the indicated times (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (E) Volcanic plot illustrating the altered proteins between control and 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The significantly downregulated and upregulated proteins are represented by blue and red dots, respectively. (Two-sided paired t test, p < 0.05, FC > 1.5). (F) Venn diagram showing the similarities and differences between 8d -treated and BPTF KD Huh7 cell groups. (G) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were pretreated with 8d (10 μM) for 24 h followed by wash-out for the indicated times. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (H) Immunoblot analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 3) of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were respectively pretreated with Poma (1 μM), MG132 (1 μM), and TP238 (10 μM) for 1 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. The data was presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; Unpaired t test. (I) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were treated with the deactivated degraders 16 , 17 and PROTAC degrader 8d (10 μM for 24 h), respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (J) IP assay using anti-BPTF and IgG control to detect the endogenous association of BPTF with CRBN (E3 ligase) and the ubiquitination level of BPTF in Huh7 cells pretreated with MG132 (1 μM) for 3 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates.

Journal: Molecular Therapy

Article Title: A BPTF-specific PROTAC degrader enhances NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.02.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: 8d selectively degrades BPTF in a proteasome-dependent manner (A) Immunoblotting of BPTF, HPSE, CECR2 and BRD9 in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) at 10 μM for 24 h, respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (B) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at the indicated doses (0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 25 μM) for 24 h β-actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (C) Degradation curves of BPTF in 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The expression level of BPTF was normalized to the level of β-actin. n = 3. (D) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at 10 μM for the indicated times (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (E) Volcanic plot illustrating the altered proteins between control and 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The significantly downregulated and upregulated proteins are represented by blue and red dots, respectively. (Two-sided paired t test, p < 0.05, FC > 1.5). (F) Venn diagram showing the similarities and differences between 8d -treated and BPTF KD Huh7 cell groups. (G) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were pretreated with 8d (10 μM) for 24 h followed by wash-out for the indicated times. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (H) Immunoblot analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 3) of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were respectively pretreated with Poma (1 μM), MG132 (1 μM), and TP238 (10 μM) for 1 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. The data was presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; Unpaired t test. (I) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were treated with the deactivated degraders 16 , 17 and PROTAC degrader 8d (10 μM for 24 h), respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (J) IP assay using anti-BPTF and IgG control to detect the endogenous association of BPTF with CRBN (E3 ligase) and the ubiquitination level of BPTF in Huh7 cells pretreated with MG132 (1 μM) for 3 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were BRD9 Rabbit mAb (CST, #58906), CECR2 Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514878), BPTF Rabbit mAb (Abcam, ab72036), HPSE Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-515935), HS Mouse mAb (Millipore, #MAB2040), CRBN Polyclonal antibody (Proteintech, 28494-1-AP), anti-ubiquitin mouse mAb (NT) (PTM BIO, #PTM-5798), β-actin (8H10D10) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700).

Techniques: Western Blot, Isolation, Control, Expressing, Ubiquitin Proteomics

The effector function of primary human NK cells toward primary HCC cells isolated from the tumor tissue of HCC patients is enhanced by 8d treatment (A) Immunoblotting of the expression of BPTF and HPSE in the lysates extracted from primary HCC cells isolated from the tumor tissue of HCC patients. The primary HCC cells were treated with or without 8d (10 μM for 24 h) before lysate extraction. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The presented image is representative of three biological replicates. (B and C) Quantification of the expression level of BPTF (B) and HPSE (C) depicted in (A). The expression levels of BPTF and HPSE were normalized to the levels of β-actin. n = 3. (D) Immunoblotting of the expression of HSPG (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) in the lysates extracted from primary HCC cells isolated from tumor tissue of HCC patients. The primary HCC cells were subjected to treatment with or without 8d (10 μM for 24 h) before lysate extraction. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The image presented is representative of four biological replicates. (E) Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 3) showing the percentage of AnnexinV + primary HCC cells (target cells) in a co-culture with primary human NK cells (effector cells) for 4 h, with a ratio of effector/target at 1:20. The control and 8d -treated primary HCC cells were included in the experiment. (F–H) Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) showing the expression of NKp30 (F), NKp46 (G), and NKG2D (H) on primary human NK cells following a 4-h co-culture with either control or 8d -treated primary HCC cells. (I–L) Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) showing demonstrated the proportion of CD69 + NK cells (I), Perforin + GZMB + NK cells (J), IFN-γ + CD107a + NK cells (K), and TNF-α + CD107a + NK cells (L) within the total population of primary human NK cells after a 4-h co-culture with either control or 8d -treated primary HCC cells. The data in (B–L) are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; paired t test.

Journal: Molecular Therapy

Article Title: A BPTF-specific PROTAC degrader enhances NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.02.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: The effector function of primary human NK cells toward primary HCC cells isolated from the tumor tissue of HCC patients is enhanced by 8d treatment (A) Immunoblotting of the expression of BPTF and HPSE in the lysates extracted from primary HCC cells isolated from the tumor tissue of HCC patients. The primary HCC cells were treated with or without 8d (10 μM for 24 h) before lysate extraction. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The presented image is representative of three biological replicates. (B and C) Quantification of the expression level of BPTF (B) and HPSE (C) depicted in (A). The expression levels of BPTF and HPSE were normalized to the levels of β-actin. n = 3. (D) Immunoblotting of the expression of HSPG (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) in the lysates extracted from primary HCC cells isolated from tumor tissue of HCC patients. The primary HCC cells were subjected to treatment with or without 8d (10 μM for 24 h) before lysate extraction. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The image presented is representative of four biological replicates. (E) Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 3) showing the percentage of AnnexinV + primary HCC cells (target cells) in a co-culture with primary human NK cells (effector cells) for 4 h, with a ratio of effector/target at 1:20. The control and 8d -treated primary HCC cells were included in the experiment. (F–H) Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) showing the expression of NKp30 (F), NKp46 (G), and NKG2D (H) on primary human NK cells following a 4-h co-culture with either control or 8d -treated primary HCC cells. (I–L) Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) showing demonstrated the proportion of CD69 + NK cells (I), Perforin + GZMB + NK cells (J), IFN-γ + CD107a + NK cells (K), and TNF-α + CD107a + NK cells (L) within the total population of primary human NK cells after a 4-h co-culture with either control or 8d -treated primary HCC cells. The data in (B–L) are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; paired t test.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were BRD9 Rabbit mAb (CST, #58906), CECR2 Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514878), BPTF Rabbit mAb (Abcam, ab72036), HPSE Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-515935), HS Mouse mAb (Millipore, #MAB2040), CRBN Polyclonal antibody (Proteintech, 28494-1-AP), anti-ubiquitin mouse mAb (NT) (PTM BIO, #PTM-5798), β-actin (8H10D10) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700).

Techniques: Isolation, Western Blot, Expressing, Extraction, Control, Flow Cytometry, Co-Culture Assay

8d treatment prevents HCC outgrowth in vivo (A) Treatment schedule of 8d in the orthotopic HCC mouse model, both in the presence of NK cells and after their depletion by applying anti-mouse NK1.1 antibody. (B) Representative images of HCC on day 21 from four different groups: HCC mice with NK cell depletion treated with vehicle (first row), HCC mice with NK cell depletion treated with 8d (second row), control HCC mice (third row), and HCC mice treated with 8d (fourth row). n = 5 for each group. The arrowheads indicate the area where the tumor is growing. (C) Quantification of liver/body weight ratio in mice from the four groups shown in (B) at autopsy on day 21. n = 5. (D–G) Immunoblot analysis and quantification ( n = 4) of the expression of BPTF (D and E), HPSE (D and F), and HSPG (D and G) in the lysates extracted from the liver tissues of HCC mice in the control and 8d groups. β-Actin was used as the loading control. (H) Representative images (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of BPTF and HPSE in the liver tissue sections of HCC mice from the four groups shown in B at autopsy on day 21. Scale bars, 50 μm. I-N. Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 5) of the expression of NKG2D (I), NKp46 (J), GZMB (K), Perforin (L), IFN-γ + TNF-α + (M), and CD107a + (N) on NK cells isolated from the liver tissues of HCC mice treated with control or 8d . The data in (C) and (E–N) are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; unpaired t test.

Journal: Molecular Therapy

Article Title: A BPTF-specific PROTAC degrader enhances NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.02.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: 8d treatment prevents HCC outgrowth in vivo (A) Treatment schedule of 8d in the orthotopic HCC mouse model, both in the presence of NK cells and after their depletion by applying anti-mouse NK1.1 antibody. (B) Representative images of HCC on day 21 from four different groups: HCC mice with NK cell depletion treated with vehicle (first row), HCC mice with NK cell depletion treated with 8d (second row), control HCC mice (third row), and HCC mice treated with 8d (fourth row). n = 5 for each group. The arrowheads indicate the area where the tumor is growing. (C) Quantification of liver/body weight ratio in mice from the four groups shown in (B) at autopsy on day 21. n = 5. (D–G) Immunoblot analysis and quantification ( n = 4) of the expression of BPTF (D and E), HPSE (D and F), and HSPG (D and G) in the lysates extracted from the liver tissues of HCC mice in the control and 8d groups. β-Actin was used as the loading control. (H) Representative images (left) and quantification (right, n = 4) of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of BPTF and HPSE in the liver tissue sections of HCC mice from the four groups shown in B at autopsy on day 21. Scale bars, 50 μm. I-N. Flow cytometry analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 5) of the expression of NKG2D (I), NKp46 (J), GZMB (K), Perforin (L), IFN-γ + TNF-α + (M), and CD107a + (N) on NK cells isolated from the liver tissues of HCC mice treated with control or 8d . The data in (C) and (E–N) are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; unpaired t test.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were BRD9 Rabbit mAb (CST, #58906), CECR2 Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514878), BPTF Rabbit mAb (Abcam, ab72036), HPSE Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-515935), HS Mouse mAb (Millipore, #MAB2040), CRBN Polyclonal antibody (Proteintech, 28494-1-AP), anti-ubiquitin mouse mAb (NT) (PTM BIO, #PTM-5798), β-actin (8H10D10) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700).

Techniques: In Vivo, Control, Western Blot, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Flow Cytometry, Isolation

Design and synthesis of BPTF-targeting PROTACs (A) The chemical structure of BPTF PROTACs. The BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) are designed with a structure that involves the conjugation of a BPTF inhibitor (TP238) to an E3 ligase binder (Poma) via linkers of varying PEG lengths. The TP238, E3 ligase binder, and linkers are highlighted in blue, red, and black respectively. (B) Binding energy of four different linker systems. T, E, and P symbolize the target protein, E3 ligase, and PROTAC molecule, respectively. The error bar was calculated as the standard deviation between different frames in a single molecular dynamics simulation system. (C) CRBN-PROTAC-BPTF ternary structure of the best-ranked 8d , in which the chemical structure of PROTAC was highlighted. CRBN was shown cyan and BPTF was shown green. The highlighted PROTAC molecule was represented using multiple colors, with TP238 in yellow, Poma in blue, and linker in orange. (D) Scheme of the action model for the designed BPTF PROTAC degrader. The PROTAC degrader recruits E3 ligase to induce ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of BPTF.

Journal: Molecular Therapy

Article Title: A BPTF-specific PROTAC degrader enhances NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.02.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: Design and synthesis of BPTF-targeting PROTACs (A) The chemical structure of BPTF PROTACs. The BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) are designed with a structure that involves the conjugation of a BPTF inhibitor (TP238) to an E3 ligase binder (Poma) via linkers of varying PEG lengths. The TP238, E3 ligase binder, and linkers are highlighted in blue, red, and black respectively. (B) Binding energy of four different linker systems. T, E, and P symbolize the target protein, E3 ligase, and PROTAC molecule, respectively. The error bar was calculated as the standard deviation between different frames in a single molecular dynamics simulation system. (C) CRBN-PROTAC-BPTF ternary structure of the best-ranked 8d , in which the chemical structure of PROTAC was highlighted. CRBN was shown cyan and BPTF was shown green. The highlighted PROTAC molecule was represented using multiple colors, with TP238 in yellow, Poma in blue, and linker in orange. (D) Scheme of the action model for the designed BPTF PROTAC degrader. The PROTAC degrader recruits E3 ligase to induce ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of BPTF.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were BRD9 Rabbit mAb (CST, #58906), CECR2 Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514878), BPTF Rabbit mAb (Abcam, ab72036), HPSE Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-515935), HS Mouse mAb (Millipore, #MAB2040), CRBN Polyclonal antibody (Proteintech, 28494-1-AP), anti-ubiquitin mouse mAb (NT) (PTM BIO, #PTM-5798), β-actin (8H10D10) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700).

Techniques: Conjugation Assay, Binding Assay, Standard Deviation, Ubiquitin Proteomics

8d selectively degrades BPTF in a proteasome-dependent manner (A) Immunoblotting of BPTF, HPSE, CECR2 and BRD9 in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) at 10 μM for 24 h, respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (B) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at the indicated doses (0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 25 μM) for 24 h β-actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (C) Degradation curves of BPTF in 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The expression level of BPTF was normalized to the level of β-actin. n = 3. (D) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at 10 μM for the indicated times (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (E) Volcanic plot illustrating the altered proteins between control and 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The significantly downregulated and upregulated proteins are represented by blue and red dots, respectively. (Two-sided paired t test, p < 0.05, FC > 1.5). (F) Venn diagram showing the similarities and differences between 8d -treated and BPTF KD Huh7 cell groups. (G) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were pretreated with 8d (10 μM) for 24 h followed by wash-out for the indicated times. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (H) Immunoblot analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 3) of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were respectively pretreated with Poma (1 μM), MG132 (1 μM), and TP238 (10 μM) for 1 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. The data was presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; Unpaired t test. (I) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were treated with the deactivated degraders 16 , 17 and PROTAC degrader 8d (10 μM for 24 h), respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (J) IP assay using anti-BPTF and IgG control to detect the endogenous association of BPTF with CRBN (E3 ligase) and the ubiquitination level of BPTF in Huh7 cells pretreated with MG132 (1 μM) for 3 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates.

Journal: Molecular Therapy

Article Title: A BPTF-specific PROTAC degrader enhances NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.02.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: 8d selectively degrades BPTF in a proteasome-dependent manner (A) Immunoblotting of BPTF, HPSE, CECR2 and BRD9 in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with BPTF PROTAC degraders ( 8a-d ) at 10 μM for 24 h, respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (B) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at the indicated doses (0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 25 μM) for 24 h β-actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (C) Degradation curves of BPTF in 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The expression level of BPTF was normalized to the level of β-actin. n = 3. (D) Immunoblotting of BPTF and HPSE in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells treated with 8d at 10 μM for the indicated times (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (E) Volcanic plot illustrating the altered proteins between control and 8d -treated Huh7 cells. The significantly downregulated and upregulated proteins are represented by blue and red dots, respectively. (Two-sided paired t test, p < 0.05, FC > 1.5). (F) Venn diagram showing the similarities and differences between 8d -treated and BPTF KD Huh7 cell groups. (G) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were pretreated with 8d (10 μM) for 24 h followed by wash-out for the indicated times. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (H) Immunoblot analysis (left) and quantification (right, n = 3) of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were respectively pretreated with Poma (1 μM), MG132 (1 μM), and TP238 (10 μM) for 1 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. The data was presented as mean ± SD; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; Unpaired t test. (I) Immunoblotting of BPTF in the total cell lysates. The lysates were isolated from Huh7 cells that were treated with the deactivated degraders 16 , 17 and PROTAC degrader 8d (10 μM for 24 h), respectively. β-Actin was used as the loading control. The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates. (J) IP assay using anti-BPTF and IgG control to detect the endogenous association of BPTF with CRBN (E3 ligase) and the ubiquitination level of BPTF in Huh7 cells pretreated with MG132 (1 μM) for 3 h before 8d treatment (10 μM for 24 h). The displayed image is representative of three biological replicates.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were BRD9 Rabbit mAb (CST, #58906), CECR2 Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-514878), BPTF Rabbit mAb (Abcam, ab72036), HPSE Mouse mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-515935), HS Mouse mAb (Millipore, #MAB2040), CRBN Polyclonal antibody (Proteintech, 28494-1-AP), anti-ubiquitin mouse mAb (NT) (PTM BIO, #PTM-5798), β-actin (8H10D10) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, #3700).

Techniques: Western Blot, Isolation, Control, Expressing, Ubiquitin Proteomics